Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alex Varghese's avatar

Good read. John Muller at the Athletic has published a lot of work that relates: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/4154516/2023/02/04/erling-haaland-is-phenomenal-so-why-hasnt-he-made-manchester-city-better/ . His takeaway is that on the whole, Haaland makes City a little worse because he doesn’t fit into Pep’s system, and in turn Pep’s system makes haaland less effective because they don’t get him out in space or in transition. I think on the scale of the 38 game league season that’s definitely true. In the Champions League, however, where being clinical and explosive is a premium, I think Haaland is a big upgrade to the false nine Pep likes in the league. I think back to the Chelsea CL final where Pep went double false-nine (insane) and they struggled to get any end product against a talented team who sat back and limited chances. While I think they (City and Haaland) do make each other a little worse in aggregate, they also have the upside for Haaland to put in 5 in a CL knockout phase and help get each other the trophy, while still being dominant enough in long run to win the PL.

Expand full comment
Kevin J. Rogers's avatar

Is it possible Guardiola is limiting Haaland because of the injuries? I have no idea if that's the case, but the thought crossed my mind during the season and your piece refined it quite a bit.

Speaking of the season, I'm a Gooner in the Prem. You're right about fine margins. All it took was one stumble -- the loss to Aston Villa in April -- and that was it. City is a machine.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts